My current focus is geospatial foundation models, machine learning and deep learning applied to
Earth observation, with satellite image time series — SAR, optical and multispectral — as the
central object of study. The guiding question studied on my master thesis is how learned embeddings transfer across regions, seasons
and sensing conditions.
That research sits on top of a genuinely different first career. Years spent producing survey deliverables
that had to be checked, defended and signed off built the habit of asking what a dataset's error budget
actually is, where the uncertainty comes from, and whether a number can be trusted. Classical geomatics is
not a detour from the present work — it is the foundation for it, and it shapes how I read machine
learning results: with attention to what the data physically is, how it was acquired, and what a headline
accuracy figure conceals.
Before geomatics there was a third field entirely: art history, conservation and restoration of fine arts,
including an Erasmus exchange in Rome. That training taught close observation, material analysis,
documentation discipline and the patience of slow, reversible work on objects that cannot be replaced. It
also produced someone comfortable being a beginner in a new discipline — which turned out to be the
transferable skill that mattered most.
The result: I have surveyed in the field, flown drones, processed point clouds under commercial deadlines,
and then trained transformers on Sentinel time series and interrogated their embeddings for hidden
geographic bias. I can speak credibly to engineers, remote sensing scientists and machine learning
researchers, because the work has genuinely been done in all three registers.
-
Three complete retrainings
Fine arts and conservation, then geospatial engineering, then AI for Earth observation — each a full
change of vocabulary, method and community, carried through to a degree or a working role.
-
Whole-stack on a geospatial problem
Field acquisition and drone piloting, proprietary survey software, scientific Python, deep learning,
cloud-native formats, distributed compute — end to end rather than one layer of it.
-
Bilingual between industry and research
Commercial survey rewards throughput, tolerances and deliverables that pass inspection. Research rewards
ablations, baselines and claims that survive scrutiny. I have worked under both.
-
Fast in unfamiliar environments
Spark, Zarr, PyTorch and RIEGL's proprietary chain share almost nothing with each other, and were picked
up across three institutions, one company and one engineering internship in a few years.
-
Comfortable outside the technical silo
A cross-disciplinary programme in Romania put geomorphologists, engineers, climate scientists,
psychologists, sociologists and anthropologists around one problem, with a joint output required.